You are here
Home > History > Murder of a monster; Mabel de Bellême

Murder of a monster; Mabel de Bellême

Porte de la ville, Sées, Normandy

This quaint tower on the edge of Sées is all that is left of a mighty entrance gate. Here a levy would be charged to every person and cart passing into the town.

The gates may have kept out the vast forests of Écouves that once stretched all the way to Paris, but they would not have keep out one of the most disliked women in medieval history. Mabel, Dame de Alençon, de Séez, and Bellême, Countess of Shrewsbury and Lady of Arundel.  As you can tell from her title, for a while she owned this town.

Meet Mabel

Mabel was born into the influential Talvas family, in Alencon in 1026. Unfortunately for Normandy she reportedly took after her father, William I Talvas, whose cruelty was legendary.  He had his wife killed on her way to church for disagreeing with him and liked to blind and mutilate enemies unfortunate enough to come within his grasp. This horrendous act forced William’s son into action and he exiled his father.  Mabel would not leave her father’s side and the pair set out into Normandy, soon convincing the influential Montgomerie family to take them in.

Mabel was rich, indulged, her father’s favourite and probably a lot more intelligent than her brothers.  She was certainly more determined.  The charm of a huge inheritance promised by her father William I Talvas (if they could get it back off his eldest son) convinced Roger de Montgomerie she should be his wife and sometime around 1054, they married.

Mutual ambition made the marriage a success and they went on to have 11 children. Roger’s friendship with the Duke of Normandy saved her inheritance and her power assured, Mabel behaved as very powerful people often do. Badly.

11th century Norman ladies of high rank
11th century Norman ladies of high rank

Miffed by Monks

Mabel resented the power and wealth of the Abbeys.  She could not openly attack them as her husband Roger loved and protected the church.  So Mabel went visiting, often.  During one expedition she arrived at St Evroul monastery accompanied by a huge retinue of 100 knights (for the monk’s protection of course) her ladies, servants and her many children.

Convention demanded the monks feed their visitors and find them and their horses adequate accommodation. The monks, who struggled to care for themselves with little land and many prayers, were soon forced into near starvation by their important guests.

Abbot Thierry, who usually could influence Mabel, questioned why she must come with her ‘worldly pomp’ to their poor monastery and warned her to curb her vanity. Furious, Mabel replied ‘next time I will bring even more knights with me’.

The wise and very fed-up Thierry is reported to have replied ‘Believe me, unless you depart from this wickedness, you will suffer for it!’ and for once she did.

By coincidence that evening Mabel began to feel rather unwell. Soon she was in agony.  Scared for her life she commanded her attendants pack and they left that night. While still on monastery land they passed the home of Roger Suisnar.  Mabel demanded his infant child suckle at the nipple causing her the most pain.  The child did, and died.  Mabel feeling much better returned home.

Mabel lived another 15 years but having felt the hand of god never went near St Evroul, or the Abbeys of Normandy, again.

Ruins of Saint Evroul Abbey
Ruins of Saint Evroul Abbey

Your land or your life

Mabel’s favourite thing was land. When Arnold de Echauffour, son of William Giroie and enemy of Mabel’s father, returned from making a fortune in Apulia, Italy he presented himself to Roger Montgomerie.

The families of Giroie and Montgomerie were old enemies but Arnold wished for a truce. He presented a fine cloak to Roger and asked that his inheritance be restored to him. Roger, always in need of loyal knights to repel attacks from Maine and Brittany made promises to do so and gave Arnold the gift of free travel across Montgomerie land.

Incandescent with rage Mabel acted quickly.  She prepared a special celebratory drink for Arnold and sent her prettiest ladies to entice him to take refreshment before his long journey. However Arnold had heard rumours of Mabel’s wickedness and distrustfully refused their kindness.

Unfortunately Gilbert, Roger’s only brother grabbed a cup and while sitting astride his horse gulped the lot down. Fortunately for Mabel, Gilbert was some miles away when after three days of agony he died. Gilbert had been a chivalrous much loved knight and was mourned deeply by his brother while Mabel stopped any comment about his death with a terrible look.

Gilbert Montgomerie may have looked a little bit like this. ish.
Gilbert Montgomerie may have looked a little bit like this. ish.

Pure poison

Thwarted in her poisonous plans, Mabel had no intention of giving up.  Using her powerful position as Roger’s wife, quite a lot of bribery and some generous promises, she made friends with Arnold’s Chamberlain the fickle knight Roger Goulafre.

She convinced him to arrange ‘special’ refreshments for Arnold, his lord Giroie of Courville and William Gouet of Montmirail while they met at Courville. Mabel was delighted when reports quickly came back of their sudden ill health.

However Giroie and Gouet were taken back to their own castles by loyal servants and slowly made a recovery.  Arnold de Echauffour, son of William Giroie was not so fortunate.

Arnold died on 1 January 1064. His lands stayed with Montgomerie and the Giroie family soon fell on difficult times.  Arnold’s infant children were sent to live as poor relations within the households of disinterested lords across Normandy.  Their mother took refuge with her wealthy brother Eudo, steward to the Duke of Normandy but the Giroie family would never be powerful again.

Beware ambitious friends

Roger Montgomerie’s influence with the Duke of Normandy combined with his and Mabel’s desire for power was a dangerous combination.  The Duke was passionate and paranoid, constantly fearing rebellion from his vassals. When Roger indicated his neighbours were planning dissent, the Duke listened. And this is how Roger and Mabel seized the lands of Eodolph de Toni, Hugh de Grant-mesnil and Arnold d’Eschafuour, amongst many others.

More land for Mabel

When Mabel’s brother, Bishop of Seez, died in 1070 she and her husband inherited his land. She had already inherited more from her father William I Talvas in 1052 as he had decided her brothers were disloyal and unacceptable heirs. This was a great inheritance which included all the lands of Bellême as well as Alençon, Domfront, and Saosmois.

Insecure neighbours and those bullied out of their lands by Roger and Mabel were horrified.  All the Duke could see was that power in the southeast of his Duchy was stable.

Mabel’s husband was one of Duke William’s principle counsellors and later chosen to co-regent with the Duke’s wife Matilda while he conquered England. He contributed 60 ships to the invasion, joined the King in 1067 and was handsomely rewarded with the Earldom of Shropshire and so much land he became one of the largest landowners in the Domesday Book.

Mabel’s future seemed assured but she had annoyed one knight too many.

Tomb of William Talvas at Notre-Dame-sur-l'Eau - one to match!
Tomb of William Talvas at Notre-Dame-sur-l’Eau – one to match!

Death of a despot

Even for those violent medieval times Mabel was a challenge.  She caused many nobles to lose their lands and become destitute either by force or influence.  Hugh Brunel (or de la roche) had lost everything to her Machiavellian ways in 1077. Unable to accept this humiliation, some months later during the night of 2 December 1079 Hugh led his three brothers and forced their way into Mabel’s Château at Bures-sur-Dives. They found Mabel in her chamber relaxing after a bath and cut off her head.  The murderers were pursued but escaped by destroying a bridge behind them and leaving Normandy. Mabel’s mangled corpse was buried three days later at Troarn Abbey.

Her epitaph is notable as an example of monks bowing more to “the partiality of her friends than to her own merits” and with restraint states

Sprung from the noble and the brave,
Here Mabel finds a narrow grave.
But, above all woman’s glory,
Fills a page in famous story.
Commanding, eloquent, and wise,
And prompt to daring enterprise;
Though slight her form, her soul was great,
And, proudly swelling in her state,
Rich dress, and pomp, and retinue,
Lent it their grace and honours due.
The border’s guard, the country’s shield,
Both love and fear her might revealed,
Till Hugh, revengeful, gained her bower,
In dark December’s midnight hour.
Then saw the Dive’s o’erflowing stream
The ruthless murderer’s poignard gleam.
Now friends, some moments kindly spare,
For her soul’s rest to breathe a prayer.

Mabel’s tomb survived into the early 18th century, but by 1752 it no longer existed.

Mabel's tomb, Troarn Abbey

Family tradition

Mabel’s son, Robert de Bellême, seigneur de Bellême (or Belèsme), seigneur de Montgomery, viscount of the Hiémois, 3rd Earl of Shrewsbury and Count of Ponthieu, carried on the family tradition. Orderic described him “Grasping and cruel, an implacable persecutor of the Church of God and the poor… unequalled for his iniquity in the whole Christian era’. The legend of Robert the Devil, fathered by Satan himself is based on him.  Mabel would have been proud.

 Nourrit in the role of Robert in Meyerbeer's opera 'Robert le diable' - 11th century images really are tricky to source...
Nourrit in the role of Robert in Meyerbeer’s opera ‘Robert le diable’ – as 11th century images really are tricky to source…

Our source for Mabel’s story

Orderic Vitalis, born 1075 is the source of many Mabel tales.  As a monk and historian living in the Abbey at St Evroul on the frontiers of Bellême land he reported her wickedness enthusiastically.

The Bellême family were the hereditary enemies of the Giroie family, who were founders of Orderic’s monastery of St Evroul and during this time there was a very uneasy truce.

Mabel was a strong woman with no love for the monks whose self-confidence was an anathema to their ideals of feminine modesty and generosity.  Was he unfair in his reports?  Orderic was raised in the Montgomerie household and his father served with Roger II de Montgomery so the tales would be quite fresh in the telling.

A fellow monk was Rainald, son of murdered Arnold which may have had an influence the tale but Orderic has a reputation for honesty, if occasional drama.

He did record that Mabel and Roger ‘establish or restore several monasteries like that of Almenêches and St. Martin of Sees …’ if only for their own family interests.

Nearly a thousand years later Mabel’s reputation for being unusually tough in what were already difficult times has survived. Was she wicked? Or were the Norman vassals jealous of a woman with so much power? We will probably never know.


A second wife for Roger de Montgomerie

After Mabel’s murder Roger de Montgomerie married Adelais, a sweet, gentle woman.  She encouraged him to make up for his past ill treatment of the monastery of St Everoul with a generous bequest, which he agreed to.  Apart from this very little is known about Adelais. We suspect Roger found her rather restful.



28 thoughts on “Murder of a monster; Mabel de Bellême

      1. She is mine too! It explains EVERYTHING about my sister though 🙂
        Funny thing is that before I ever even knew all this I came to live in a very beautiful place – Basse Normandie. I lived near the Giroie lands and then just outside Sées, I know Belleme and Alençon. Its bizarre how fate has actually brought me to the land of my ancestors!

  1. A tall tale. The notion that an infant died suckling at her nipple is ridiculous. I do not doubt Mabel infuriated many and probably exceeded society’s expectations of what a woman should be.
    Mabel is my 28th paternal great grandmother. The women in my family are high spirited, cheerful, forthright, stubborn, proud and outspoken. People either love us or despise us, strangely we do not inspire a lukewarm reception. Do I think Mabel was a monster no, indulgent and fiery certainly but consider this if Roger was an ardent supporter of the church would he marry the alleged devil incarnate let alone have 11 children with her.

  2. The Montgomerie men were poisoners, too. Roger I rebelled agains the child William, Duke of Normandy. When William’s uncle and guardian Alan III Duke of Brittany besieged Roger in his home castle in 1039/40, Roger arranged for a poisoned riding glove to be handed to Alan.
    I suspect it was his son Roger II while governor of Normandy in December 1066 who did the same to Duke Conan II of Brittany who had pacified northern Anjou was marching north with a very formidable army, by the looks of it to stake his (legitimate) claim on Normandy.
    Thenceforward, the Breton leadership began to wear iron gloves over their leather ones while riding on campaign so they wouldn’t have to replace them.
    Roger II at first joined Odo of Bayeux’s 1088 rebellion against William II, but Bishop Wulfstan and the English Fyrd made quick work of his proud army, so he came crawling back to the king. He resorted to trying to undermine the royal campaign from the inside, as his sons were still on Odo’s side.
    When William II won the war, he threatened the rebel leaders with hanging as traitors, and the English crowds cheered. But his military commander, the very wise Count Alan Rufus, nephew of Alan III and cousin to Conan II, advised the king to spare and restore them, for the good of the realm. Only Odo and a few others were exiled to Normandy.
    Two and a half years later, William and Alan led an English army to conquer Normandy. The locals were enthusiastic in their welcome, as Alan had a reputation for bringing great prosperity.
    Unfortunately, the French king Philip I, feeling imminently threatened, summoned the French Pope Urban II (yes, the one who later pronounced the First Crusade) to negotiate a peace treaty to divide the Duchy. Alan, being a pious man, undoubtedly felt obliged.
    Orderic had a high opinion of Alan Rufus and his brothers, but sadly wrote only a couple of lines about them, because, he said, their careers merited a separate biography that would fully occupy a scholar.

  3. Probably not evil though, just able, strong and forceful in defending her territory against the expansion of catholic power over the nobility of the times Her tactics in dis-empowering their proselytistic incursions by constantly beggaring their monasteries by her visits, was a very clever way of stultifying their ambitions. Rather than brute force, using their own laws of hospitality against them suggests an intelligent approach, and has a delightful irony!
    The whole history of the Montgomerie -Belleme dynasty is very expansive and well worth the study. Apparently the research around Montgomerie’s Motte and Bailey ruins is one of the longest archaeological digs undertaken in Britain. Started in the 1960’s and as far as I am aware carries on to this day. Lots more to discover yet!

  4. Mabel is my 33rd Great Grandmother, I don’t know how much is true and I have a social conscience, however I am extremely forthright some say tough. It has shocked me to find out I have this lineage. We have always been political in the last 2 centuries so perhaps it has always been so. This has been a total revelation to me.

    1. He Jenny, thanks for your comment its very interesting to hear from one of Mabel’s relations. She was living in incredibly challenging times, who knows what any of us would do in her place. Perhaps inheriting a little of Mabel’s strength isn’t such a bad thing!

  5. I am sure the stories surrounding Mabel are embellished. But, where there is smoke there is fire. You would have to make someone very angry to get yourself beheaded in such a fashion.

  6. Mabel is my 28th gem too! Hoping she was not as bad as that. Her daughter Sibyl de Montgomerie was my 27 GGM and was King Henry I ‘s 5th mistress. I am descended from them.

  7. Greetings,
    I spent some time exploring Bures and Troarn with a native of Caen, my friend Aude. There is almost nothing left except a bit of Troarn Abbey, although it seems there might still be the ruin of a buried chateau near Bures. A somewhat more even-handed biography of Mabel was written by Eric LeClercq in 2012 (sorry, French only). She may have been a wicked woman but from the little known of her, she was well-educated and playing for keeps in a man’s world.

    1. In case someone gets the wrong idea that Orderic disliked strong women, he was effusive in his admiration for the forthright Elisabeth (“Isabelle”) de Montfort, “who rode armed as a knight among the knights”.
      What Orderic despised were sneaks, male or female, who were cowardly used underhanded methods or got others to risk their lives to do their dirty work for them, while they sat back safely behind castle walls.
      The men who murdered Mabel took a fearful risk, entering her castle. Maybe they used the law of hospitality against her? That would be a delightful irony.

    1. Sadly, humans can be worse than monsters. Mabel was cruel, avaricious and a poisoner. So was her husband and his father the first Roger de Montgomery.
      It’s not because Mabel was a “strong” woman that she was disliked: Orderic admired Elisabeth de Montfort for riding “armed as a knight among the knights”.

  8. I have just finished a dissertation about Mable of Belleme and power of 11th century Norman noblewomen. My current interest is in locating her lost tomb. Any ideas where I could search? The abbey of Troarn where she was originally interred was annexed by St. Louis de Saint Cyr just prior to the French Revolution, so I may begin my search there. Any other places/ guesses would be helpful to me!

  9. A very spooky picture of Mabel is painted in George Shipway’s excellent historic novel The Paladin, about William II Rufus’ alleged murderer Walter Tirel of Poix. Not only is Mabel pictured as a frightfully charming female Macchiavelli, when Robert Curthose seeks sanctuary at her castle in Rémalard, later on there’s an encounter in the forest outside the castle with an old hag witch torturing and mutilating a young girl surrounded by chanting nude co-witches. Walter recognizes Mabel instantly, even when she makes off on hands and feet. Her beheading by Hughes de la Roche-d’Inge in Rémalard Castle is described as well though it slightly differs from what I pick up on the net. Mabel in Shipway’s vision was not a nice person at all. Her son Robert of Mèlesme is The Paladin’s main crook. Cruel and Machiavellian in the extreme a true mother’s son! Excellent read! There is no writer who paints these times and landscapes as realistic and bleak and murderous as George Shipway. Read his masterpiece Knight in Anarchy.

  10. Mabel is a distant GGM. Certainly the stories are sobering…however, as you mentioned, likely embellished over the years. I hope, at least, that she was not quite as ruthless as she has been portrayed by history.

    1. Mabel is my GGM also. One writer thought she was not so black as painted, as the main source of information was written by someone employed by a family that had a grudge against the Talvas family.

      1. Thank you for commenting, good to see there is still some family loyalty! It is easy to believe Mabel was blamed when no longer around to defend herself.

      2. Sorry, but no: Orderic and St Evroul owed much to their Montgomery benefactors. He had firsthand knowledge and would only have published it if the Montgomery themselves admitted it to be true.
        Mabel’s poetic epitaph is written in a cautious style that hints at her reputation even on her home turf.
        The fact is, both women and men (such as her Montgomery in-laws who were also poisoners) can be wicked.

Leave a Reply

Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.